Erkkila, T. (2010). Transparency and Nordic Openness: State Tradition and New Governance Ideas in Finland. Transparenz. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften , 348- 372.
Florini, A. (2000). Does the invisible hand need a transparent glove? The politics of transparency. World Banks Annual Conference on Development Economics , 163-184.
Gabus, A. & Fontela, E. (1973). Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communication with those bearing collective responsibility. DEMATEL Report No. 1. Geneva. Switzerland. Battelle Geneva Research Center, 251-272.
Garcia-Marco, F.-J. (2010). Updating Official Publications to the Web 3.0: A Quantum Leap in e-Gov Transparency and Citizen Participation Is on Sight. Electronic Government and the Information Systems , 92-99.
Hall, Richard H. (2002)., organization: structures, proceses and outcomes, 8th ed, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall,1-324.
He, Z. (2000). Corruption and anti-corruption in reform China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 33(2), 243-270.
Hwang, C. L. & Yoon, K. (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Application: A State – of –The Art Survey, Berlin, Springer- Verlag, 1-233.
Jaffe, R., Nash, R. A., Ash, R., Schwartz, N., Corish, R., Born, T., & Lazarus, H. (2006). Healthcare transparency: Opportunity or mirage. Journal of Management Development, 25(10), 981-995.
Kim, S., & Cho, K. (2005). Achieving Administrative Transparency Through Information Systems: A Case Study in the Seoul Metropolitan Government. Springer Berlin Heidelberg , 113-123.
Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly , 42-50.
Klitggard, R. (1997). Controlling Corruption, Institute for International Economics Pub. Washington: Washington DC, 1-225.
Laffont, J. (1990). Analysis of hidden gaming in a three level hierarchy. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization , 301-324.
Lai, V. S., Wong, B. K., & Cheung, W. (2002). Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 137(1), 134-144.
Lin, C.L. & Tzeng, G.H. & chang, H.C.(2009). A value –created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL. Expert system with Application, 36(6), 9683-9697.
Mantysaari, P. (2010). The law of corporate finance: general principles and EU law. Springer , 167-678.
Martinez, A. (2011). The regulation of diffusion of public sector information via electronic means: Lessons from the Spanish regulation. Government Information Quarterly, 28 , 188-199.
Meijer, A. (2009). Understanding modern transparency. Internationa
l Review of Administrative , 255-269.
Mintz, A., Geva, N., Redd, S. B., & Carnes, A. (1997). The effect of dynamic and static choice sets on political decision making: An analysis using the decision board platform. American Political Science Review, 553-566.
Mityakov, S. & Serguey Braguinsky(2013).Foreign corporations and the culture of transparency: Evidence from Russian administrative data. Journal ofFinancialEconomics , 1-26.
Muenstermann, B., von Stetten, A., Laumer, S., & Eckhardt, A. (2010). The performance impact of business process standardization: HR case study insights. Management Research Review, 33(9), 924-939.
Perez, C. C., Bolivar, M. P. R., & Hernandez, A. M. L. (2010). The OECD budgetary transparency: An examination of online budgetary information across European Union Countries. In Comparative E-Government. 587-614.
Perritt, H. (1997). Open government. Government Information Quarterly , 14, 397-406.
Ralph H. Sprague, J., & McNurlin, B. C. (1993). Information Systems Management in Practice. Prentice Hall PTR , 255-565.
Ratnovski, L. (2013). Liquidity and transparency in bank risk management. J. Finan. Intermediation , 422-439.
Relly, J. E., & Sabharwal, M. (2009). Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross-national study. Government Information Quarterly , 148-157.
Smith, R., & Bertozzi, M. (1998). Principals and agents: An explanatory model for public budgeting. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management , 10, 325-353.
Stapenhurst, F., & Langseth, P. (1997). The role of the public administration in fighting corruption. International Journal of Public, 311-330.
Strausz, R. (1997). Delegation of monitoring in a principal-agent relationship. The Review of Economic Studies , 64, 337-357.
Su, H. Y., Fang, S. C., & Young, C. S. (2011). Relationship transparency for partnership enhancement: an intellectual capital perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(6), 456-468.
Svensson, G. (2007). Legal requirements for transparency in appointments and promotions in Swedish higher education institutions. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(2), 118- 133.
Tirole, J. (1986). Hierarchies and bureaucracies: On the role of collusion in or organizations. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization , 181-214.
Turskis, Z., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). A novel method for multiple criteria analysis: grey additive ratio assessment (ARAS-G) method. Informatica, 21(4), 597-610.
Vermeulen, P. A. M., & Curseu, P. L. (Eds.). (2010). Entrepreneurial strategic decision-making: A cognitive perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing, 1-231.
Vishwanath, T., & Kaufmann, D. (1999). Towards transparency in finance and governance. The World Bank Draft , 1-30.
Weber, R. H. (2010). Discussion Topics of Internet Governance. In Shaping Internet Governance: Regulatory Challenges. Springer Berlin Heidelberg , 105-174.
Wu, W.-W., &Lee, Y, T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert system with Application, 32 (2). 499-507.
Xenakis, A., & Macintosh, A. (2003) Using Knowledge Management to Improve transparency in e-voting. KMGov, 274- 284.
پیوستها
پیوست الف
پرسشنامه شماره ۱- دسته بندی زیرمعیارها
بسمه تعالی
با سلام و احترام
پرسشنامه پیش رو به منظور گردآوری اطلاعات مبتنی بر نظر خبرگان جهت انجام پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد با عنوان ” شناسایی و الویت بندی عوامل موثر بر شفافیت نظام اداری ایران با بکارگیری تکنیک های تصمیم گیری گروهی فازی (ناظر بر بند ۱۸ سیاستهای کلی نظام اداری)” طراحی شده است. مستدعی است براساس تجارب و دانش خود هر یک از گزینه هارا در دسته های نام برده شده دسته بندی نمائید. شایان ذکر است، نظرات ارزشمند شما به عنوان امانتی گران بها نزد محقق باقی خواهد ماند و مالکیت معنوی نتایج آن تنها برای انجام و ارائه در رساله کارشناسی ارشد محفوظ خواهد ماند.
باتشکر از همکاری شما